> Was this maybe intended? otherwise in case BFI_PPORT_I2H_ENABLE_RSP: > the same code is executed. Please review. Making this change alone will break compilation since bfa_pport_disable_rsp_s is not defined. To fix this, we should also replace it with bfa_pport_generic_rsp_s in bfi_pport_i2h_msg_u. But please keep this as it is for now since I am working on resubmitting 2.1.2.1 patch, and there are a lot of changes in this area. Thanks Jing > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c > index aef648b..f00d07b 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c > @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bfa_pport_isr(struct bfa_s *bfa, struct bfi_msg_s > *msg) > break; > > case BFI_PPORT_I2H_DISABLE_RSP: > - if (pport->msgtag == i2hmsg.enable_rsp->msgtag) > + if (pport->msgtag == i2hmsg.disable_rsp->msgtag) > bfa_sm_send_event(pport, BFA_PPORT_SM_FWRSP); > break; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
