Re: qlogic lockdep warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



qla24xx_msix_default is using spin_lock_irq and spin_unlock_irq within
the irq handler...
I think convert to spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore can solve
this warning.

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 17:10 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
>> [   77.962879] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [   77.965784] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2332
>> trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xc6/0x14b()
>> [   77.977492] Hardware name: Sun
>> [   77.979485] Modules linked in:
>> [   77.994337] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted
>> 2.6.33-rc4-tip-yh-03949-g3a8e3f5-dirty #64
>> [   78.000120] Call Trace:
>> [   78.013298]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81076b54>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0x94
>> [   78.017746]  [<ffffffff81cd712c>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x36
>> [   78.035171]  [<ffffffff81076b80>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x16
>> [   78.040152]  [<ffffffff810a2ae8>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xc6/0x14b
>> [   78.055400]  [<ffffffff810a2b7a>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
>> [   78.058951]  [<ffffffff81cd712c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x36
>> [   78.074889]  [<ffffffff816461ef>] qla24xx_msix_default+0x243/0x281
>> [   78.091598]  [<ffffffff810a5752>] ? __lock_release+0xa5/0xae
>> [   78.096799]  [<ffffffff810c02ae>] handle_IRQ_event+0x53/0x113
>> [   78.111568]  [<ffffffff810c2061>] handle_edge_irq+0xf3/0x13b
>> [   78.116255]  [<ffffffff81035109>] handle_irq+0x24/0x2f
>> [   78.132063]  [<ffffffff81cdc4b4>] do_IRQ+0x5c/0xc3
>> [   78.134684]  [<ffffffff81cd7393>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf
>> [   78.137903]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff81039a56>] ? mwait_idle+0xaf/0xbb
>> [   78.155674]  [<ffffffff81039a4d>] ? mwait_idle+0xa6/0xbb
>> [   78.158600]  [<ffffffff81031c7c>] cpu_idle+0x61/0xa1
>> [   78.174333]  [<ffffffff81c85d7a>] rest_init+0x7e/0x80
>> [   78.178122]  [<ffffffff82832d1f>] start_kernel+0x316/0x31d
>> [   78.193623]  [<ffffffff82832297>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xa7/0xab
>> [   78.198924]  [<ffffffff8283237f>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xe4/0xeb
>> [   78.214540] ---[ end trace be4529f30a2e4ef5 ]---
>
> It appears the thing tries to enable IRQs from within an IRQ handler,
> naughty.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux