On Tuesday 19 January 2010 10:23:43 am James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 10:20 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 January 2010 10:19:04 am Alok Kataria wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 10:08 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 10:04 -0800, Alok Kataria wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:38 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > pvscsi_setup_msix() expects 'irq' argument to be an int but is > > > > > > being passed unsigned int. Unsigned int is more proper type for > > > > > > IRQ number so let's use it. This shuts off a compile warning with > > > > > > recent compilers. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > LGTM. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > That would be acked-by unless you want to resend the patch to me? I > > > > don't have an unmangled copy of it, so someone needs to send it to > > > > the scsi list. > > > > > > Acked-by is fine with me too. If its an hassle to pick these lines > > > after the patch is sent, I am totally fine if you pick the patch > > > without my Acked-by or SOB line, just wanted to acknowledge that the > > > change is fine by me. > > > > Hm, I wonder why the original did not make through to linux-scsi/James. > > I will resend from my other address then. > > Well, sometimes it's because someone is using a mail tool that breaks > threading ... but I did a subject search, it definitely isn't in my > folder. Vger has a fairly esoteric spam reduction mechanism based on > regexps ... perhaps you fell foul of that? Mutt usually does not fail me when sending patches. Let's see if my other account works better. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
