On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 03:43:44PM -0700, Moger, Babu wrote:
> - DMERR("Cannot failover device because scsi_dh_%s was not "
> - "loaded.", m->hw_handler_name);
> + DMERR("Could not failover device. Error %d.", errors);
Would it be meaningful still to include m->hw_handler_name in that message?
Alasdair
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
