Re: [PATCH 3/3 version 2] scsi_lib: Collapse scsi_end_request into only user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/04/2010 08:23 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> 
>> Embedding scsi_end_request() into scsi_io_completion actually simplifies the
>> code and makes it clearer what's going on.
>>
>> There is absolutely no functional and/or side effects changes after this patch.
>>
>> Patch was inspired by Alan Stern. (version 2 comments by Matthew Wilcox)
> 
>> -	/*
>> -	 * A number of bytes were successfully read.  If there
>> -	 * are leftovers and there is some kind of error
>> -	 * (result != 0), retry the rest.
>> -	 */
>> -	if (scsi_end_request(cmd, error, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL)
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	error = -EIO;
>> -
>> -	if (host_byte(result) == DID_RESET) {
>> +	if (likely(!blk_end_request(req, error, good_bytes))) {
>> +		cmd->request = NULL;
>> +		action = ACTION_NEXT_CMND;
>> +	} else if (error && scsi_noretry_cmd(cmd)) {
>> +		/* kill remainder if no retrys */
>> +		blk_end_request_all(req, error);
>> +		cmd->request = NULL;
>> +		action = ACTION_NEXT_CMND;
>> +	} else if (result == 0) {
>> +		action = ACTION_REPREP;
>> +	} else if (host_byte(result) == DID_RESET) {
> 
> A few comments in these new "if" cases would help readers to understand
> the logic here.
> 
> My personal preference is to reverse the order of the "if (error && 
> scsi_noretry_cmd(cmd))" and the "if (result == 0)" sections.  It would 
> make more sense; that way we'd have:
> 
> 	If the request is finished [blk_end_request() == 0]
> 		...
> 	else if the request was successful but has more work to do
> 			(result == 0)
> 		...
> 	else if there was an error and retries are disallowed
> 		...
> 	else ... [other error handling]
> 
> Interchanging the order wouldn't make any functional difference, 
> because the code above this point guarantees that we can never have 
> result == 0 and error != 0.
> 
> Apart from these small issues, it looks perfect.
> 
> Alan Stern
> 

Thanks Alan.

I agree with your comments and will send a new version.

Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux