Re: [PATCH] libsrp: fix compile failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > Yes, it indeed is that way -- Andew pulls whole linux-next as one of the 
> > patches into -mm series.
> > 
> > To make linux-next really working the way it is intended to work we need 
> > to have -mm part of it, as it is used as a last point for a non-trivial 
> > amount of patches before they enter Linus' tree.
> > 
> > Andrew, why do we have the current setup, and not the other way around?
> 
> Because I suck.  I haven't yet got around to feeding -mm into 
> linux-next.  It's a bit tricky, because -mm is based on linux-next. 
> Probably we'll address this by adding a "linux-next before the mm bits" 
> marker to linux-next.

Yup. That should work and would be really helpful.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux