Re: Thin provisioning fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:01:57PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I was waiting for the discussion to settle and a repost. Let me know if
> I should just pick up the current #1.

As far as I'm concerned the discussion was just about the example use
case Martin mentioned.  Exposing wether a device zeroes discarded blocks
is a good thing in general.

Note that we might have to add blacklists for this in libata pretty soon
as the OCZ Vertex seems to get it wrong, but that's material for another
patch not touching the block layer..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux