On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 20:29 +0800, Andy Yan wrote: > From 8687e06d9f636828e006fc4938513ce4731ea356 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Andy <ayan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:26:39 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH 7/7] Update to match latest libsas > > Signed-off-by: Andy <ayan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jacky <jfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ke <kewei@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c > index 7ced157..51bb6fe 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c > @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ int mvs_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) > scsi_adjust_queue_depth(sdev, MSG_SIMPLE_TAG, 1); > #endif > } else > - sas_change_queue_depth(sdev, MVS_QUEUE_SIZE); > + sas_change_queue_depth(sdev, MVS_QUEUE_SIZE, SCSI_QDEPTH_DEFAULT); No. A patch series has to be bisectable, so introduce the right signature in patch 5 instead of introducing the wrong one and fixing it in patch 7 James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
