Re: Thin provisioning update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 13:58 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> Ok.  Jens, please queue the patch below.  And then we'll have to see
> >> about getting James to rebase and/or postpone the SCSI portion to
> >> round #2.
> 
> Christoph> Can't we please get both patches in through one tree?
> Christoph> Everything else is a bit of a pain to manage.
> 
> I'm intimately familiar with said pain.  Pretty much everything I do
> touches both block and scsi :/
> 
> But James has been pretty good about rebasing scsi-misc on top of Jens'
> tree.  That's how we've done all the other tricky merges.
> 
> James, what do you think?

SCSI pretty much pioneered the use of postmerge trees, which is how I do
this ... if everyone's happy, that's what I'll do this time.

James



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux