Mike Christie wrote:
James Smart wrote:
Does this really do what you want ? Don't you want something that
dequeues the request, and errors it out ?
The dequeue and fail happens just below the code in the patch:
Ah - I was thinking of the check in the reverse.... Agree.
Acked-By: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxx>
We'll have to address the rport teardown case independently.
-- james
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
