question about drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The function sas_ata_task_done in the file drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c 
contains the following code:

	if (stat->stat == SAS_PROTO_RESPONSE || stat->stat == SAM_GOOD) {
		ata_tf_from_fis(resp->ending_fis, &dev->sata_dev.tf);
		qc->err_mask |= ac_err_mask(dev->sata_dev.tf.command);
		dev->sata_dev.sstatus = resp->sstatus;
		dev->sata_dev.serror = resp->serror;
		dev->sata_dev.scontrol = resp->scontrol;
	} else if (stat->stat != SAM_STAT_GOOD) {
		ac = sas_to_ata_err(stat);
		if (ac) {
			SAS_DPRINTK("%s: SAS error %x\n", __func__,
				    stat->stat);
			/* We saw a SAS error. Send a vague error. */
			qc->err_mask = ac;
			dev->sata_dev.tf.feature = 0x04; /* status err */
			dev->sata_dev.tf.command = ATA_ERR;
		}
	}

Should the reference to SAM_STAT_GOOD be instead a reference to SAM_GOOD?  
They both have the same value (0), but SAM_STAT_GOOD is defined in a 
different file than the other constants used with stat->stat.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux