Re: MD/RAID time out writing superblock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Chris Webb wrote:
>
> > Would such very slow (but ultimately successful) flushes be
> > consistent with the theory of power supply issues affecting the
> > drives? It feels like the 30s timeouts on flush could be just a more
> > severe version of the 15s very slow flushes.
> 
> Probably not.  Power problems usually don't resolve themselves with
> longer timeout.  If the drive genuinely takes longer than 30s to
> flush, it would be very interesting tho.  That's something people have
> been worrying about but hasn't materialized yet.  The timeout is
> controlled by SD_TIMEOUT in drivers/scsi/sd.h.  You might want to bump
> it up to, say, 60s and see whether anything changes.

I'll add that to the list of things to check out on the test machine with a
more disposable installation on it! The 15s flushes we're seeing on
superblock barrier writes do already feel dangerously close to the 30s
hardcoded timeout to me: it's only a factor of two.

Cheers,

Chris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux