Re: MD/RAID time out writing superblock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ric Wheeler wrote:
>>> The drive might take a longer time like this when doing error handling
>>> (sector remapping, etc), but then I would expect to see your remapped
>>> sector count grow.
>>>      
>> Yes, this is a possibility and according to the spec, libata EH should
>> be retrying flushes a few times before giving up but I'm not sure
>> whether keeping retrying for several minutes is a good idea either.
>> Is it?
> 
> I don't think that retrying for minutes is a good idea. I wonder if this
> could be caused by power issues or cable issues to the drive?

IIRC, there were two identified weird reasons for flush timeouts.  The
first was quirky firmware which meant that using NCQ meant timeouts on
FLUSH.  The second was flaky power.  So, yeah, it can be caused by
power issue.  Not so sure about cable tho.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux