On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Jens Axboe<jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11 2009, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Anyway, YMMV, I would appreciate some test results (and as usual, that >> > even includes just saying that it boots and functions for you). If >> > people feel adventurous, patches for other controllers will be happily >> > queued up for testing. I may even be convinced to implement support >> > for your controller of choice, if you have some fast storage hooked up >> > and would like to experiment. Generally, adding support to a driver is >> > not very hard and the two conversions included were also meant to serve >> > as an inspiration. >> >> Sounds very interesting. Have you already considered patching the SRP >> initiator ? During the SRP performance tests I ran CPU usage on the >> initiator was more than 95% and on the target less than 10%. > > No I haven't, if you point me at which srp files, I can take a look. The relevant source files are: include/scsi/srp.h include/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.h drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.h drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c drivers/scsi/libsrp.c drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp_internal.h Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
