Re: [PATCH 1/6] RFC: beiscsi : handles core routines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 03 2009, Mike Christie wrote:
> Hey Jens,
>
> Is your block napi code going to go upstream soon? Does it need more  
> testing or users?
>
> This driver is just using a normal old work queue for the completion  
> path, so I wanted to see about having Jay convert it to your code.

I plan to include the core bits for 2.6.32, so should be heading to
mainline soon(ish) :-)

>
>
>
> On 07/28/2009 02:13 AM, Jayamohan Kallickal wrote:
>> + */
>> +irqreturn_t be_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct beiscsi_hba *phba = NULL;
>> +	struct hwi_controller_ws *phwi_controller;
>> +	struct hwi_context_memory *phwi_context;
>> +	struct be_eq_entry *eqe = NULL;
>> +	struct be_queue_info *eq;
>> +	unsigned long flags, index;
>> +	unsigned int num_eq_processed;
>> +
>> +	phba = (struct beiscsi_hba *)dev_id;
>> +	phwi_controller = GET_HWI_CONTROLLER_WS(phba);
>> +	phwi_context = phwi_controller->phwic;
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->isr_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	eq =&phwi_context->be_eq.q;
>> +	index = 0;
>> +	eqe = queue_tail_node(eq);
>> +	if (!eqe)
>> +		SE_DEBUG(DBG_LVL_1, "eqe is NULL\n");
>> +
>> +	num_eq_processed = 0;
>> +	while (eqe->
>> +	       dw[offsetof(struct amap_eq_entry, valid) /
>> +		  32]&  EQE_VALID_MASK) {
>> +		switch ((u32)
>> +			(eqe->
>> +			 dw[offsetof(struct amap_eq_entry, major_code) /
>> +			    32]&  EQE_MAJORCODE_MASK)) {
>> +		case EQ_MAJOR_CODE_COMPLETION:
>> +			/* Determine which CQ to process. */
>> +			if (((eqe->
>> +			      dw[offsetof(struct amap_eq_entry, resource_id) /
>> +				 32]&  EQE_RESID_MASK)>>  16) ==
>> +			    phwi_context->be_cq.id) {
>> +				SE_DEBUG(DBG_LVL_8, "\t\t todo_cq is set\n");
>> +				phba->todo_cq = 1;
>> +			} else {
>> +				SE_DEBUG(DBG_LVL_1,
>> +					 "\t\t Invalid CQ to process\n");
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		default:
>> +			SE_DEBUG(DBG_LVL_1,
>> +			 "Unexpected struct eq_entry major_code: 0x%x\n",
>> +			  (eqe->dw[offsetof(struct amap_eq_entry, major_code) /
>> +				     32]&  EQE_MAJORCODE_MASK));
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Mark this struct eq_entry as invalid */
>> +		AMAP_SET_BITS(struct amap_eq_entry, valid, eqe, 0);
>> +		queue_tail_inc(eq);
>> +		eqe = queue_tail_node(eq);
>> +
>> +		num_eq_processed++;
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->isr_lock, flags);
>> +	queue_work(phba->wq,&phba->work_cqs);
>> +	hwi_ring_eq_db(phba, phwi_context->be_eq.q.id, 0,
>> +			/* clear interrupt */
>> +			num_eq_processed, 1, 1);
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux