>Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] [net-next-2.6 PATCH 5/5] fcoe: Use NETIF_F_FCOE_MTU >flag to set up max frame size (lport->mfs) > >From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx> >Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:48:03 -0700 > >> Yes, absolutely, but it's only this small patch that creates the >> dependency. I figured that all of the other fcoe patches could go into >> James' scsi-misc tree and get merged first. Then this one could go into >> his scsi-post-merge tree and depend on net-next. >> >> It's really up to you and James, I just thought that would be easier. > >So I tried to apply just the networking bits but none of the ixgbe >parts apply properly to net-next-2.6, so this patch series will >need to be respun and resubmitted in it's entirety so I can >apply it properly. > >It seems that the ixgbe driver now maintains feature flags differently >than whatever revision of the driver these patches were generated >against. >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Thanks, I will go back and update these patches to sync w/ the current net-next-2.6. There seem to be patches in net-next-2.6 from net-2.6 after rebasing which were not there at the time these patches were submitted. Thanks, yi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
