On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:01 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 01:16 +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 13:33 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > > James, > > > > > > Please let us know which way you want us to proceed ? > > > > Yes, propose a mechanism that keeps manual binding but allows the dm-mp > > user an exception. > > James, this is the current behavior. We wanted to make the binding > automatic, hence the patches. OK, well then no ... I'm not breaking an unknown number of enterprise configurations by forcing a binding where none is wanted or needed. Find a way to do what you want while not breaking anyone else. > > For the actual binding I still think it should be > > part of generic driver multiple binding. > > I don't quite understand what does this mean. Can you elaborate, please. http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=124699047711732 Specifically the second half. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
