>>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: James> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 09:38 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 07/13/2009 10:43 PM, John Stoffel wrote: >> >>>>>> "John" == John Stoffel <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > >> > Dammit, I messed up here sending this patch. I've just edited the >> > subject line and re-sent it with a bit more description. I think this >> > patch is perfectly good to go into 2.6.31 right now, esp since it's >> > not changing code, just whether the code is turned on by default from >> > now on. >> > >> >> I would like it if you'd also CC stable@xxxxxxxxxx on this patch. As this >> condition is already true for distros in the field. James> The stable tree is for bug *fixes*. Moving an option out from James> under experimental is basically an enhancement, even if it James> could be argued it should have been done long ago. I'm not so sure I agree with this, since this feature is used by UDEV and has been enabled by default on a bunch of distros for ages (as I'm told, personally I haven't confirmed this). But if you object to stable back porting, what are you feelings on this change for 2.6.31-rc* now? Do you think it needs to be held off and that it's too late to make this change? Thanks, John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
