From: Swen Schillig <swen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
We should not modify the port status after triggering an ERP action
for the port. It is not guaranteed which status is finally active
when the ERP action is performed. This can lead to situations which
are unwanted and hard to debug in case of a failure.
Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -urpN linux-2.6/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c linux-2.6-patched/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
--- linux-2.6/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c 2009-07-12 21:08:41.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6-patched/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c 2009-07-12 21:08:56.000000000 +0200
@@ -1731,15 +1731,16 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_close_physical_port
zfcp_fsf_access_denied_port(req, port);
break;
case FSF_PORT_BOXED:
- zfcp_erp_port_boxed(port, "fscpph2", req);
- req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR |
- ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_RETRY;
/* can't use generic zfcp_erp_modify_port_status because
* ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN must not be reset for the port */
atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_PORT_PHYS_OPEN, &port->status);
list_for_each_entry(unit, &port->unit_list_head, list)
atomic_clear_mask(ZFCP_STATUS_COMMON_OPEN,
&unit->status);
+ zfcp_erp_port_boxed(port, "fscpph2", req);
+ req->status |= ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR |
+ ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_RETRY;
+
break;
case FSF_ADAPTER_STATUS_AVAILABLE:
switch (header->fsf_status_qual.word[0]) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
