On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:50:04 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09 2009, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [PATCH] block: call blk_scsi_ioctl_init() > > > > Currently, blk_scsi_ioctl_init() is not called so > > blk_default_cmd_filter isn't initalized. Some commands are not blocked > > wrongly. > > > > This fixes a regression introduced: > > > > commit 018e0446890661504783f92388ecce7138c1566d > > Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri Jun 26 16:27:10 2009 +0200 > > > > block: get rid of queue-private command filter > > > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > block/scsi_ioctl.c | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c > > index f0e0ce0..e5b1001 100644 > > --- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c > > +++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c > > @@ -680,3 +680,4 @@ int __init blk_scsi_ioctl_init(void) > > blk_set_cmd_filter_defaults(&blk_default_cmd_filter); > > return 0; > > } > > +fs_initcall(blk_scsi_ioctl_init); > > -- > > 1.6.0.6 > > You beat me to it, it was the missing call as I suspected. This > works, I verified it myself. Applied to for-linus, going upstream > soon. I really hope that you become more serious about not causing such incident; breaking mainline kernel by merging your trivial patch after -rc1 (even without sending the patch to any mailing list). You broke mainline in the exact same way just months ago (the commit 1e42807918d17e8c93bf14fbb74be84b141334c1 in 2.6.29-rc7). Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
