On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 16:54 -0700, Paul Lung (paul.lung@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using 2.6.25.14 kernel with the qla2xxx driver turned on for a > SAN, and I tried to use SCLI from QLogic to get the linux device->wwn > mapping. However, SCLI does not seem to be able to detect any LUNs > with the driver in 2.6.25 kernel. You'll need to ask qlogic about their tools. > I then found that doing a scsi_id on a device(say, ./block/sde) will > give me the wwn, with an extra number in the front. man scsi_id will tell you what this is and why it's there. > However, further research seems to indicate that scsi_id does not > always give back the wwn. It's is totally dependent on the physical > device being queried. For WWN this is true ... the device must export it properly via the correct VPD inquiry for it to be displayed ... although most fibre devices do nowadays. > So, is there any way to reliably get the WWN of a linux device? The > qla2xxx driver must have gotten the wwn of all the drives on the SAN. > Is this information "published" anywhere? I think you're confusing WWN and WWPN ... it's the latter the fibre has to know. If it's the WWPN you're after, it's the fc_transport port_name attribute (either of the rport or the target). James > > Thank you very much for your time. > > Paul Lung-- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html