On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:05:19AM -0400, Ming Lei wrote: > 2009/5/5 David VomLehn <dvomlehn@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:55:39PM -0400, Ming Lei wrote: > >> On Fri, 1 May 2009 19:30:00 -0700 > >> David VomLehn <dvomlehn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > >> > index 6f51ca4..735b061 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > > ... > >> > @@ -1834,6 +1834,7 @@ static int do_scan_async(void *_data) > >> > struct async_scan_data *data = _data; > >> > do_scsi_scan_host(data->shost); > >> > scsi_finish_async_scan(data); > >> > + initdev_probe_done(BOOTDEV_BLOCK_MASK); > >> > >> Which code are waiting for the block device's probe done? > > > > None yet. That remains to be done. > > > > Would you mind submitting the code path of waitting for probe done to allow a > intact review? Without the waitting code, it is a a little difficult > to undersand or verify > your patch, IMHO. This will be in the next spin of the patch, coming soon (possibly today). > Thanks > Lei Ming David VomLehn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
