Re: [PATCH 05/13] block: Export I/O topology for block devices and partitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> I really hate the 'alignment' name, nobody will know wtf that is
>> without looking it up. The rest of the names are fairly self
>> explanatory.  offset? offset_size? misalignment? Not very good with
>> names, but perhaps we can find something more appropriate :-)

Yeah, it's a tricky thing to convey.  And despite all the other
convergence otherwise happening in the standards, T10 and T13 do not
agree how to describe the logical/physical alignment.


Mike> I agree that 'alignment' is too terse/confusing given that it is
Mike> an offset we're exposing.  How about 'alignment_offset'?

I thought I had already changed it to alignment_offset like we talked
about a while ago.  But I guess that change was only done mentally :)

Jens, are you ok with that name?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux