On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:32:24AM -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > I agree with Hannes, that we should allow multipath to override the > default attachment, mainly to give control to the user. > But, I have a small issue with the attached patch. See below. > I prefer not to detach a previously attached hardware handler, if > multipath doesn't have any handler associated with the device. Leaving > it will not do any hard to multipath as the multipath layer would not > call scsi_dh_activate for the device. On balance, I'm inclined to agree - too many layers of config overlapping here. If you agree, would one of you like to submit the patch to dm-devel properly, with appropriate signoffs and a descriptive patch header? Alasdair -- agk@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
