Re: [Scst-devel] Discussion about SCST sysfs layout and implementation.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
Let's go with root in /sys/class/scsi_tgt. In future, if somebody objects, we can easily change it.

This maps too closely to the scsi midlayer names, especially the real target devices initiators see - which are not yet in sysfs but there has been discussion of in the past. I would prefer that you used /sys/class/scst_tgt. And yes, as part of the class level support in the midlayer/kernel, they are generally symlinks to the actual kobject in the /sys/devices that the class entity corresponds to.

IMHO - "scsi_tgt" also seems a bit presumptuous to propose if SCST is not, in it's entirety, going to be the adapter target interface pulled in upstream. Thus, another reason I prefer the "scst_tgt" name, as it makes it very specific to SCST itself, and lessens any co-existence conflicts if there are any in the future.

-- james s
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux