From: Martin Petermann <martin.petermann@xxxxxxxxxx>
The current sbal counting can be wrong if a fsf request is
waiting for free sbals and at the same time qdio request queue
is shutdown and re-opened. Revering a previous patch fixes this
issue.
Signed-off-by: Martin Petermann <martin.petermann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c 2009-04-17 15:03:44.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c 2009-04-17 15:03:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -645,30 +645,30 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_exchange_port_data_
}
}
-static int zfcp_fsf_req_sbal_get(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
- __releases(&adapter->req_q_lock)
- __acquires(&adapter->req_q_lock)
+static int zfcp_fsf_sbal_check(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
{
struct zfcp_qdio_queue *req_q = &adapter->req_q;
- long ret;
- if (atomic_read(&req_q->count) <= -REQUEST_LIST_SIZE)
- return -EIO;
- if (atomic_read(&req_q->count) > 0)
- return 0;
+ spin_lock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock);
+ if (atomic_read(&req_q->count))
+ return 1;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int zfcp_fsf_req_sbal_get(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter)
+{
+ long ret;
- atomic_dec(&req_q->count);
spin_unlock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock);
ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(adapter->request_wq,
- atomic_read(&req_q->count) >= 0,
- 5 * HZ);
- spin_lock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock);
- atomic_inc(&req_q->count);
-
+ zfcp_fsf_sbal_check(adapter), 5 * HZ);
if (ret > 0)
return 0;
if (!ret)
atomic_inc(&adapter->qdio_outb_full);
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&adapter->req_q_lock);
return -EIO;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
