Bart Van Assche schrieb:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The target is running Debian Lenny 64bit userspace on an Intel Celeron
2.93GHz CPU, 2 GB RAM.
Initiator is running Debian Etch 64 bit userspace, open-iscsi 2.0-869, Intel
Xeon 3050/2.13GHz, 8 GB RAM.
Each test was repeated 6 times, "sync" was made and caches were dropped on
both sides before each test was started.
dd parameters were like below, so 6.6 GB of data was read each time:
dd if=/dev/sdag of=/dev/null bs=64k count=100000
Data was read from two block devices:
- /dev/md0, which is RAID-1 on two ST31500341AS 1.5 TB drives
- encrypted dm-crypt device which is on top of /dev/md0
Encrypted device was created with the following additional options passed to
cryptsetup
(it provides the most performance on systems where CPU is a bottleneck, but
with decreased
security when compared to default options):
-c aes-ecb-plain -s 128
Generally, CPU on the target was a bottleneck, so I also tested the load on
target.
md0, crypt columns - averages from dd
us, sy, id, wa - averages from vmstat
1. Disk speeds on the target
Raw performance: 102.17 MB/s
Raw performance (encrypted): 50.21 MB/s
2. Read-ahead on the initiator: 256 (default); md0, crypt - MB/s
md0 us sy id wa | crypt us sy id wa
STGT 50.63 4% 45% 18% 33% | 32.52 3% 62% 16% 19%
SCST (debug + no patches) 43.75 0% 26% 30% 44% | 42.05 0% 84% 1% 15%
SCST (fullperf + patches) 45.18 0% 25% 33% 42% | 44.12 0% 81% 2% 17%
Hello Tomasz,
How is it possible that for this test the read performance through
STGT (50.63 MB/s) was higher than the read performance on the target
(50.21 MB/s) ? Are you sure that all read buffers were flushed before
this test was started ?
You're looking at wrong columns:
md0 crypt
STGT 50.63 32.52
RAW 102.17 50.21
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
