Re: [Scst-devel] ISCSI-SCST performance (with also IET and STGT data)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bart Van Assche, on 04/02/2009 12:14 AM wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
==================================================================
I. SEQUENTIAL ACCESS OVER SINGLE LINE

1. # dd if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/null bs=512K count=2000

                       ISCSI-SCST      IET             STGT
NULLIO:                 106             105             103
FILEIO/CFQ:             82              57              55
FILEIO/deadline         69              69              67
BLOCKIO/CFQ             81              28              -
BLOCKIO/deadline        80              66              -

I have repeated some of these performance tests for iSCSI over IPoIB
(two DDR PCIe 1.0 ConnectX HCA's connected back to back). The results
for the buffered I/O test with a block size of 512K (initiator)
against a file of 1GB residing on a tmpfs filesystem on the target are
as follows:

write-test: iSCSI-SCST 243 MB/s; IET 192 MB/s.
read-test: iSCSI-SCST 291 MB/s; IET 223 MB/s.

And for a block size of 4 KB:

write-test: iSCSI-SCST 43 MB/s; IET 42 MB/s.
read-test: iSCSI-SCST 288 MB/s; IET 221 MB/s.

Do you have any thoughts why writes are so bad? It shouldn't be so..

Or: depending on the test scenario, SCST transfers data between 2% and
30% faster via the iSCSI protocol over this network.

Something that is not relevant for this comparison, but interesting to
know: with the SRP implementation in SCST the maximal read throughput
is 1290 MB/s on the same setup.

This can be well explained. The limiting factor for iSCSI is that iSCSI/TCP processing overloads a single CPU core. You can prove that on vmstat output during the test. Sum of user and sys time should be about 100/(number of CPUs) or higher. SRP has a lot more CPU effective, hence better has throughput.

If you try to test with 2 or more parallel IO streams, you should have the correspondingly increased aggregate throughput up to the moment you hit your memory copy bandwidth.

Thanks,
Vlad


Bart.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Scst-devel mailing list
Scst-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scst-devel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux