* Jean Delvare (jdelvare@xxxxxxx) wrote: > Making the freeing of q->queue dependent on q->pool being set looks > really weird (although it is correct at the moment. But this seems > to be fixable in a much simpler way: Fine by me. I condsidered that and for some reason I thought it was odd to do it that way ;-) The pool is the ->buffer used in the fifo, but... Acked-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
