On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, James Bottomley wrote: > OK, but resending a patch you expressed reservations about putting in > without testing doesn't really help me. I need a way to get comfortable > with its safety. > > So, what about this alternative fix instead: if the removal were moved > to scsi_host_put(), that would address all the problems and have the > advantage that everyone will test it ... I thought of doing it that way too. It has the disadvantage of exposing part of the proc interface to userspace before the host is registered. Now, since all we're adding is the host's directory, maybe this doesn't matter. But it didn't seem like a good idea. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
