Re: [PATCH v3 sent again] introduce soft reset handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sathya,

On Friday 06 February 2009 08:04:24 Prakash, Sathya wrote:
> Bernd,
> I think, there are certain other areas which needs fix up.  For example you
> have added the ioc_reset_in_progress flag in the MPT_ADAPTER and used it 
> instead of diagPending. But the diagPending is not removed from MPT_ADAPTER
> structure and hence there is possibility for that variable getting refered
> in other places whereas it is not getting set in the HardResetHandler So
> remove the variable from MPT_ADAPTER and solve the compile errors by
> replacing the diagPending with ioc_reset_in_progress. You can refer LSI
> code you have. Thanks
> Sathya

hmm, actually I thought diagPending and ioc_reset_in_progress are two 
different issues. But so it just seems to be a renaming. So I made an extra 
patch for that. I also noticed (already before), that in the your 4.x driver 
it doesn check in the reset handler for ioc->alt_ioc->ioc_reset_in_progress. 
Did this accidentaly happen or on purpose?


Thanks,
Bernd



-- 
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux