Re: [PATCH ver2 printk_ratelimit] bsg: Error print if device is not bidi capable when refusing a bidi command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:38:38 +0200
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> If a bidi command was issued to a request_queue not mark as
> QUEUE_FLAG_BIDI. Issue an error report. This is a misconfiguration
> an administrator would like to know about, which is otherwise
> hard to detect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/bsg.c |    5 +++++
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
> index 44a2a0f..1da14fe 100644
> --- a/block/bsg.c
> +++ b/block/bsg.c
> @@ -270,6 +270,11 @@ bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
>  
>  	if (rw == WRITE && hdr->din_xfer_len) {
>  		if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_BIDI, &q->queue_flags)) {
> +			if (printk_ratelimit()) {
> +				printk(KERN_ERR
> +					"bsg: Attempt to send a bidi command "
> +					"to a none bidi device\n");
> +			}
>  			ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  			goto out;

I don't think that we need this patch. Returning -EOPNOTSUPP should be
enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux