On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:24:36 +1100 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Given that SLAB and SLUB are fairly mature, I wonder what you'd think of > taking SLQB into -mm and making it the default there for a while, to see > if anybody reports a problem? Nobody would test it in interesting ways. We'd get more testing in linux-next, but still not enough, and not of the right type. It would be better to just make the desision, merge it and forge ahead. Me, I'd be 100% behind the idea if it had a credible prospect of a net reduction in the number of slab allocator implementations. I guess the naming convention will limit us to 26 of them. Fortunate indeed that the kernel isn't written in cyrillic! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
