Stefan Richter wrote: > Tony Battersby wrote: > >> OK, so your argument now seems to be that the code just might in >> practice work correctly, but in theory it is not philosophically right, >> semantically pure, or politically correct >> > > Nonsense. > > I wrote that there is a bug if you have a reference while the reference > count is zero. > Being pragmatic, I call that a _philosophical_ objection rather than a bug because the code does actually work in practice as far as I can tell. But you can call it a bug if you like. If you want me to give in and call it a bug, then you will have to come up with an actual case where the code fails to do the right thing - memory use after free, double free, memory leak, oops, etc. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
