Greg KH wrote: > I'd be interested in seeing how you propose such a change so that it > works properly for people, because as you have noted, others have had > this same problem. > > I strongly object to the use of sg_kref_get_not_zero(), as you are just > providing a private version of this function, which you shouldn't be > doing. > > OK, then I'll just send kref_get_not_zero() as a separate patch to kref.c. If there are no objections to that patch, then I'll update my sg patch to use the new officially-blessed function. In the meantime, the patch I already posted should work the same way as a split patch, so if anyone has any other objections, then let me know. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
