On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 16:28 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:50 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> currently we have this:
> >>
> >> struct scsi_device *scsi_device_lookup_by_target(struct scsi_target *starget,
> >> uint lun)
> >> {
> >> struct scsi_device *sdev;
> >> struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent);
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >>
> >> spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> >> sdev = __scsi_device_lookup_by_target(starget, lun);
> >> if (sdev && scsi_device_get(sdev))
> >> sdev = NULL;
> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> >>
> >> return sdev;
> >> }
> >>
> >> now consider an sdev list with two entries for LUN 0, the first
> >> being in SDEV_DEL and the second being in SDEV_RUNNING.
> >>
> >> scsi_device_lookup_by_target will always return NULL here, as
> >> it will never be able to skip past the first (unuseable)
> >> entry. So scsi_report_lun_scan will happily create duplicate
> >> sdevs for LUN 0 and we'll be getting the infamous
> >>
> >> sysfs: duplicate filename 'xxxx' can not be created
> >>
> >> errors.
> >>
> >> What we should be doing here is to restart
> >> __scsi_device_lookup_by_target() if we find an
> >> sdev but cannot use it (ie is in SDEV_DEL).
> >>
> >> James, please apply.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Hannes
> >> plain text document attachment (scsi-restart-lookup-by-target)
> >> Restart scsi_device_lookup_by_target()
> >>
> >> When scsi_device_lookup_by_target() will always return
> >> the first sdev with a matching LUN, regardless of
> >> the state. However, when this sdev is in SDEV_DEL
> >> it's quite possible to have additional sdevs in the
> >> list with the same LUN which are active.
> >> So we should restart __scsi_device_lookup_by_target()
> >> whenever we find an sdev with state SDEV_DEL.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > That's brilliant, thanks for finding this bug.
> >
> > rather than go to the trouble of restarting the scan looking for
> > duplicates, since none of the users of __scsi_device_lookup_by_target
> > actually want invisible dying devices in SDEV_DEL, why not just make it
> > skip over them. If we ignore devices in SDEV_DEL, the target id of the
> > visible devices should all be unique, so alter the
> >
> > if (sdev->lun == lun)
> >
> > to
> >
> > if (sdev->lun == lun && sdev->sdev_state != SDEV_DEL)
> >
> > And everything should work.
> >
> > I think this is the correct fix because scsi_device_get() is also
> > programmed to ignore devices in SDEV_DEL (for the same reason).
> >
> As already mentioned, I'm not sure if esp_scsi.c expects it to
> be that way. If someone confirms that we won't break it with this
> change, then of course it's the easier way.
I did check esp ... it's looking for the hostdata in the device, so
returning a SDEV_DEL device to it while another is in the list will
really confuse it, because it will have a stale (and possibly freed)
hostdata structure, so checking for SDEV_DEL will correct a potential
bug in it as well ... that's why I was suggesting this way. All of the
users are expecting live and visible devices.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
