On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:25:14 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:10:41 -0800 Arjan van de Ven > <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > kernel/async.c | 307 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Am still wondering if this is unacceptably duplicative of dhowells's > slow-work infrastructure: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/20/193 ok having looked at it a lot more; I can add priorities to the async function calls, at which point they are a superset to the slow-work infrastructure basically. I'll need to check with David to make 10)% sure the solution I have in mind will work for him, but I suspect it will. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
