Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:21:25 +0000
Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Right now I don't think I have time for it (this is going to take
> > time.. there's so many weird things with serial ports that it's
> > bound to break stuff in the beginning etc)
> 
> I can't duplicate this. Can you check you don't have
> 
> config SERIAL_8250_DETECT_IRQ
>         bool "Autodetect IRQ on standard ports (unsafe)"
>         depends on SERIAL_8250_EXTENDED
>         help
>           Say Y here if you want the kernel to try to guess which IRQ
>           to use for your serial port.
> 
>           This is considered unsafe; it is far better to configure the
> IRQ in a boot script using the setserial command.
> 
>           If unsure, say N.
> 
> 
> enabled
> 
ok I had that enabled somehow....
retesting now


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux