Re: READ CAPACITY 16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:11 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:04:52PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Actually, we can't afford to send READ CAPACITY(16) to failing devices;
> > some of them never come back.
> 
> When you say 'never come back', do you mean:
> 
> a) The drive discards the command silently
> b) The drive hangs until a reset is issued
> c) The drive hangs until it's power-cycled
> d) The drive turns into a paperweight

All of the above ... this is USB ... well, I don't *know* of a D
case ... but I wouldn't bet one doesn't exist.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux