On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Another approach is to increase skb's shared data (at the end of the > skb->data), and this approach was not frowned upon too much either, but > it requires to mess with skb->destructor, which may not be appropriate > in some cases. If iscsi does not use sockets (it does iirc), things are > much simpler. Hello Evgeniy, Any idea whether it would be acceptable to extend "struct sock" with one or two pointers to callback functions ? These callback functions could be called from skb_release_data() etc. through the "struct sock* sk" member of "struct sk_buff". Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
