On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 20:24 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger >> <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Things are moving quickly for Target_Core_Mod/ConfigFS and LIO-Target >> > v3.0 development, and I invite folks to have a look at the code. To >> > dive into the rest of the v3.0 code via git-web, check out: >> > >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=tree;f=drivers/lio-core >> >> I didn't have a look at the LIO code, but I ran it through checkpatch. >> The result summary is as follows: >> > Thanks for the note, but checkpatch output on the entire tree (not just > the patchs I posted) does not really help the discussion. Obviously > this is on my list before submission for Target_Core_Mod/ConfigFS for > v2.6.29. However, what would be nice if you actually sent a kernel > patch for these issues. I ran checkpatch on the files in drivers/lio-core ONLY. I did this by converting all the files in drivers/lio-core through a script into a patch, and by running checkpatch on the generated patch. And as you already know I'm not going to work on LIO. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
