On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 12:44 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > James: > > > > There hasn't been any feedback on this patch: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=122513368301598&w=2 > > > > It was modified in the way you requested. Does it need to be revised > > any more? > > Probably not. I really dislike a check and retry on something which is > theoretically a legal return, but I suppose I can put it in and see if > anything breaks. It's too bad that the scsi_execute_req() interface loses all information about how much data the device actually sent. If that information were preserved then it wouldn't be necessary to rely on this not-quite-satisfactory sort of test. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
