Re: [RFC] FC pass thru - Rev IV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi James,

On Nov 25, 2008, at 6:38 AM, Seokmann Ju wrote:

On Nov 24, 2008, at 1:03 PM, James Smart wrote:
[snip]

2. Would  it be valuable to consider sending requests with
  WWNN:WWPN?

I considered this, especially for the fchost ELS request. But it means the LLDD has to do a nameserver query to find the n_port_id
corresponding to the names before it sent the ELS. It started to feel
like too much ancillary stuff for the LLDD to do to support the
request - so I punted.  However, the app, where we typically don't
care if it has to do more work, is free to do this and resolve it to
the basic primitives. :)
Thanks, I've got it.
One minor questions/clarification.
If I understood correctly, ELS only supports single sg. If this is true, shouldn't it checked somewhere before the transport layer calls LLD?

Thank you,
Seokmann
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux