On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:31 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > I was going to suggest adding a description to the ILLEGAL REQUEST > > > case. But that case arises normally under various circumstances, so > > > perhaps it wouldn't be appropriate. In fact, do you really want to > > > print out the result and sense data every time that case occurs? > > > > I think it's OK. I thought some of the CD probing routines triggered > > illegal requests, but I can't seem to see it on my test machines (it > > could be I have the wrong type of CD, though). > > So then it would make sense to add a description to that case as well. Well, yes and no ... I can't see a description being much more descriptive than what scsi_print_sense will already print ... mind you, the same is true of volume overflow. I'll remove that one. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html