[PATCH] fc_transport: fix old bug on bitflag definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I thought we had corrected this a while ago - however, it's still
in 2.6.28-rc?.

When the fastfail flag was added, it did not account for the flags
being bit fields. Correct the definition so there is no longer a
conflict.

James - we need to get this into 2.6.28

-- james s



 Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxx>

 ---

 scsi_transport_fc.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


diff -upNr a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h	2008-10-18 10:32:54.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h	2008-11-20 10:54:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ struct fc_rport {	/* aka fc_starget_attr
 /* bit field values for struct fc_rport "flags" field: */
 #define FC_RPORT_DEVLOSS_PENDING	0x01
 #define FC_RPORT_SCAN_PENDING		0x02
-#define FC_RPORT_FAST_FAIL_TIMEDOUT	0x03
+#define FC_RPORT_FAST_FAIL_TIMEDOUT	0x04
 
 #define	dev_to_rport(d)				\
 	container_of(d, struct fc_rport, dev)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux