[PATCH] [14/21] Rely on block layer bouncing for ISA DMA devices scanning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Remove unchecked_isa_dma references in scsi_scan.c Instead we rely on
the block layer bouncing here. This is safe because all ISA DMA drivers have
been converted to set a suitable bounce pfn. Also scanning is not performance
critical, so a copy more or less doesn't matter.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2008-11-15 22:37:08.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2008-11-15 22:37:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -1028,8 +1028,7 @@
 	if (!sdev)
 		goto out;
 
-	result = kmalloc(result_len, GFP_ATOMIC |
-			((shost->unchecked_isa_dma) ? __GFP_DMA : 0));
+	result = kmalloc(result_len, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!result)
 		goto out_free_sdev;
 
@@ -1348,8 +1347,7 @@
 	 * prevent us from finding any LUNs on this target.
 	 */
 	length = (max_scsi_report_luns + 1) * sizeof(struct scsi_lun);
-	lun_data = kmalloc(length, GFP_ATOMIC |
-			   (sdev->host->unchecked_isa_dma ? __GFP_DMA : 0));
+	lun_data = kmalloc(length, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!lun_data) {
 		printk(ALLOC_FAILURE_MSG, __func__);
 		goto out;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux