Keith Owens wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:23:17 -0500,
Black_David@xxxxxxx wrote:
Dave,
The thin provisioning chunk size (coming) in the VPD page is a
possible place to start.
VPD page for which device? Consider a filesystem that is striped
across devices from multiple arrays or even multiple vendors. How is
the filesystem supposed to "align" an unmap command when the underlying
disks all have different alignments?
I think that we are losing focus on the core use case here. Big arrays
that implement thin luns also implement RAID in the box. If you are
building a clustered file system, it would be extremely unlikely to
build it with storage from different vendors.
You always have the option to disable thin luns or simply fully
provision LUN's for more complex situations.
Thing is being pitched to answer a very specific customer use case -
shared storage (mid to high end almost exclusively) with several
different users and applications....
ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
