On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:42:15 -0500 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 14:24 -0700, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > - udelay(0x800); > > + mdelay(2); > > + udelay(48); > > OK, this fix is obviously wrong ... the code holds off interrupts for > two ticks that's clearly completely bogus. In this case silencing the > warning is hiding the bogosity ... now if only someone could actually > fix it ... > That'll take some heavy lifting. There's an mdelay(128) a few lines up! I'd suggest that you merge this to fix the ARM build then hurriedly find something else to look at :( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
