matthieu castet wrote: > Hi, > > Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> There was a correct and simple patch proposed that fixes this problem >> the right way: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=121762869915609&w=2 >> >> Doug could you please test this patch to see if it fixes your device? >> >> scsi-core already gives drivers complete control on what sense_size to >> fetch. It is a parameter to the scsi_eh_prep_cmnd() call. So no need >> for slave_configure(), default value, and all that loop. >> >> Matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx> wrote ... >>> we have got report from 2 users that scsi sat (to do ata passthrough) was not fully \ >>> working with some usb bridge (maxtor and western digital). Everything works except \ >>> the sense result was incomplete [1]. >>> >>> >>> After some investigation, they need a sense size different of 18 (at least 22). [2] >>> >>> Because some devices can crash if the sense size is different of 18, in order to not \ >>> break these devices a flag that is set either by unusual entries, either for spc3 or \ >>> latter devices is used. >>> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > What the status of that. > > Should I try to resubmit that patch on linux-usb ? > I see the To: is me. But I'm not a USB guy at all. Like you said, I too think the best is to freshen up the patch for latest USB tree and send it to the USB mailing list. Cheers Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
