Re: [PATCH] scsi/sd: Fix size output in MB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:45:49 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:59 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:45:16 -0600
> > Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > 2. We should report in GB or TB when appropriate.  The exact definition
> > > of 'appropriate' is going to vary from person to person.  Might I
> > > suggest that we should report between two and four significant digits.
> > > eg 9543 MB is ok, 10543 MB should be 10 GB.
> > > 
> > 
> > I've been looking at doing something like this for the mmc_block
> > driver, so a generic helper is welcome. :)
> 
> Does MMC have the 10^3 requirement like SCSI/ATA disks do, or can you
> use 2^10 like standard computer stuff for capacities?
> 

Some do, some don't. I prefer the 2^10 and MiB variants as it avoids
ambiguity.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux